ABC reports October 7 facts after 11 months of running with propaganda
Australia's national broadcaster becomes the first major Western broadcaster to report Israel's use of the Hannibal Directive, after the genocide primer served its purpose.
This story was first published by Consortium News
At the weekend Australia’s national broadcaster, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), featured a story reporting the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) had indeed carried out the Hannibal Directive, killing untold numbers of Israeli civilians on October 7.
It regurgitated several reports in Israeli media dating back as far as January, which revealed the use of the doctrine, interpreted as a license to kill Israeli soldiers being taken hostage by the enemy.
In this case the directive was used after Israelis, mostly civilians, were taken prisoner by the Al-Qassam Brigades, either as they were being transported to Gaza or held captive in their homes at kibbutzim in southern Israel.
The latest of those reports, by Israeli newspaper Haaretz in July, revealed IDF commanders had ordered captured soldiers to fire at three separate locations, explicitly referencing the Hannibal Directive.
The ABC story should not be seen as a sign of legacy media finally coming round to reporting on Gaza truthfully.
Instead, the story should be viewed as an example of establishment media’s propensity for begrudgingly giving a nod to demonstrable facts only when deemed safe to do so.
In fact, the belated reporting of Israel’s use of the Hannibal Directive 11 months into a genocide reveals a qualitative difference between a passive and subservient mainstream media and an active and vital independent journalism earnestly working in the public interest and in accord with the Genocide Convention, a UN legal instrument that demands states take steps to stop genocide from occurring.
It is telling that the only original element in the ABC story were comments the broadcaster sought from “Israeli philosopher” Asa Kasher, author of the IDF’s code of ethics, who said use of the directive had been “legally wrong and morally wrong.”
The directive had supposedly been revoked in 2016 after Israel’s attorney-general said killing a hostage was prohibited.
The ABC’s use of Kasher as a salient voice is typical of the way in which a story is framed serves to obscure the nature of Israel’s colonial domination and the illegality of its occupation.
It also gives a type of balance to the story that keeps the broadcaster safe from the worst excesses of Zionist lobbying, while setting the narrow parameters of acceptable criticism of Israel.
Although Israel is responsible for deliberately killing possibly hundreds of its own citizens during its response to October 7, this was presented by Kasher as an aberration, a scandalous lack of professional standards of an army bound by an ethical code within a democratic state.
Key act of avoidance
Hence, what the ABC story avoided doing was pointing out that Israel falsely blamed Hamas for killing 1400 Israelis, the original inflated figure it used before it was revised down to under 1200, as part of a disinformation campaign to demonise the resistance group and dehumanise Gazans in general in the wake of Operation Al Aqsa Flood. According to the latest figures, of the 1139 killed, 373 were security force members and 71 were foreigners.
That figure of 1200 killed by Hamas is still routinely reported by corporate media. [Kamala Harris in her debate with Donald Trump this week repeated the disinformation, saying Hamas had killed 1200 Israelis.]
Other elements of this propaganda included false accounts of dozens of babies beheaded, others ripped from the womb or cooked alive in ovens, as well as systemic rape and horrific disfigurement of women by resistance fighters.
These stories, devised by Israeli military and political figures and laundered by mainstream media, helped whip up an orgy of hate, revenge and frenzied support within Israeli society for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s biblical injunction to commit genocide against an occupied population under siege.
The propaganda, crudely calibrated to appeal to a deep-seated Orientalism within the West, including a fear of barbarous, irrational Muslims murdering Europeans in the most savage fashion, sought to condition the public to accept Israel’s erroneous right to defend itself in whatever way it saw fit.
Led by the United States, Western governments spoke with one voice after October 7, giving diplomatic cover to atrocities that may yet result in some leaders facing charges at the International Criminal Court (ICC).
This was the framing by independent journalists at outlets like Electronic Intifada, The Grayzone and Consortium News and their reports were written at the time when challenging the dominant narrative was critical.
The ABC report said some testimonies from Israeli civilians and military personnel said that Israeli forces responding to the Hamas attack had killed Israelis, but that those making such statements were condemned. However, it added, there followed more testimonies and Israeli media reports confirming it was true.
That paragraph, with its reference to the “condemnations” of the testimonies, was the nearest the ABC journalist came to explaining why their outlet had not reported the Hannibal Directive’s use before now — external pressure.
From option to imperative
The doctrine, written in 1986 in response to the kidnapping of Israeli soldiers in Lebanon, gave the IDF an option of taking a risk of killing soldiers when attacking their hostage-takers. Over time it evolved into a strategic imperative of killing their own as a better option than having them taken prisoner.
It was clear why Hamas took 251 hostages back to Gaza on October 7, according to Israel. In 2011, Hamas swapped one Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit, for more than 1000 prisoners. No doubt the Hamas leadership wanted to use them to bargain over the thousands of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli dungeons, some 9940 as of June, according to human rights organisations.
The ABC news piece acknowledged the veracity of Israeli media reports that the IDF dispatched attack drones, fired hellfire rockets and 30mm cannons from dozens of helicopters at vehicles that were driving away from the Nova Music Festival and that tanks fired into houses at Kibbutzim as resistance fighters gathered up hostages.
It quoted former Air Force Colonel Nof Erez, who had told a Haaretz podcast:
“This was a mass Hannibal. It was tons and tons of openings in the fence, and thousands of people in every type of vehicle, some with hostages and some without.”
His comments followed early reports in January in the newspaper Yedioth Ahronot, which said IDF pilots attacked vehicles returning to Gaza despite a fear they might contain hostages.
Reporter Yoav Zeitoun stated:
“Twenty-eight fighter helicopters shot over the course of the day all of the ammunition in their bellies, in renewed runs to rearm. We are talking about hundreds of 30-millimetre cannon mortars and Hellfire missiles.
The frequency of fire at the thousands of terrorists was enormous at the start, and only at a certain point did the pilots begin to slow their attacks and carefully choose the targets.”
He said tank officers also confirmed they applied their own interpretation of the directive when firing on vehicles returning to Gaza.
Another journalist, Ronen Bergman, writing for the same newspaper in January, said 70 vehicles were destroyed by Israeli tanks and firing from aircraft killing everyone inside.
He said the IDF
“instructed all its fighting units… to stop ‘at all costs’ any attempt by Hamas terrorists to return to Gaza, using language very similar to the original ‘Hannibal Directive,’ despite repeated assurances by the security establishment that the procedure has been cancelled.”
The ABC pointed out that Israeli civilians survived Israeli forces firing on them and killing other hostages during at least two incidents, repeating testimonies of Kibbutz survivors who said they had been fired on by the IDF, from a helicopter at Nir Oz and from tank shelling at Be’eri.
Timing and complicity
The BBC, CNN and other Western media institutions have yet to follow the ABC in acknowledging the Hannibal Directive was used on October 7. Given the reliability of eyewitness accounts and statements of military officials featured in Israeli media and disseminated by Western independent journalists, those stories are inevitable but remain a matter of timing.
Acknowledging that Israel knew its own forces had slaughtered its own citizens — just as it is doing by killing Israeli hostages amid its indiscriminate bombing of Gaza — risks removing a key building block of Israel’s justification for annihilating the basic means of survival in Gaza in its “war against Hamas.”
As the IDF responded to the ABC’s request for a response to its story:
“The IDF is currently focused on eliminating the threat from the terrorist organisation Hamas. Questions of this kind will be looked into at a later stage.”
Media self-censorship is time-dependent, with omission and obfuscation useful and necessary for a particular period, according to the agenda it serves, in this case, an ethnic cleansing not yet fully complete.
Eventually news leaders, either to save credibility or remain relevant, allow journalists to report facts. And when that happens, foreign policy settings of Western governments typically dictate the depth and pace of disclosure.
Why the ABC published the article now remains open to speculation. It could be that a reporter pushed the issue, maybe even using ABC chairman Kim Williams’ recent scathing assessment of the broadcaster’s poor treatment of world news on its website as leverage to get something published.
What remains clear is the belated story points to a cowardice among ABC newsroom leaders, forever wary of a backlash from the Israeli lobby and a sub-imperial Australian government zealously aligned with US foreign policy if the dominant narrative isn’t being adhered to.
Their approach contrasts sharply with the courage of independent journalists, subject to character assassinations and even arrest under anti-terror laws, as was the case with journalists Richard Medhurst and Sarah Wilkinson recently in the UK. Their work remains contemporaneous instead of post facto, bringing information into the public domain so that the destruction of the Palestinian people can be halted while in motion, before fully enacted.
Thank you for your report. I do, however, take issue with one important part. Your report implies that the “1,200 Israeli civilians killed on 7 October”, whether by the Palestinian resistance or the IOF, is an accepted fact. This is clearly not the case. I refer you to the following article, which contains appropriate links to sources.
https://open.substack.com/pub/euroyankee/p/israel-has-a-nasty-habit-part-iii
Even the figure stated there of 695 is misleading in my opinion since the Israeli authorities count armed police and intelligence agents as “civilians “.